How Does Guided Inquiry Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Literacy? An Experimental Study for Mathematics Learning

Luthfi Nur Azizah, Ali Mahmudi

Abstract


This paper reports a quasi-experimental study with one group pre-test post-test design on promoting mathematical literacy using guided inquiry method. As one of the important education goals globally, mathematical literacy focuses on a concrete dimension with context and content to be studied. A total of 32 secondary school students of class VIII participated as a sample and 192 students as a population in the study. Students' mathematical literacy was measured by using an essay test. The students' responses were analysed and compared using paired sample t-Test. It was found that the guided inquiry method successfully promotes students' mathematical literacy as indicated by the result of paired sample t-test values of significance (2-tailed) of 0.000 < 0.05. Thus, the guided inquiry can be used as an alternative learning method to improve students' mathematical literacy.

Keywords


guided inquiry, mathematical literacy, quasi-experimental.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Colburn, A. (2000). An Inquiry Primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ612058

Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a

Hassi, M., & Laursen, S. L. (2015). Transformative Learning: Personal Empowerment in Learning Mathematics. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(4), 316–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344615587111

Higo, A., Wada, Y., & Sato, Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship between Iranian students’ Mathematical Literacy and Mathematical performance. Journal of American Science, 59(11), 562–571. Retrieved from https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/nskkk/59/11/59_562/_pdf

Jiang, F., & Mc Comas, W. F. (2015). International Journal of Science theEffects of Inquiry Teaching on Student Science Achievement and Attitudes: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis of PISA Data. International Journal of Science Education, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426

Khan, A. W. (2012). Inquiry-based teaching in mathematics classroom in a lower secondary school of Karachi, Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(2), 1–7. Retrieved from http://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_ied_pdcc/7

Khoirudin, A., Setyawati, R. D., & Nursyahida, F. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Berkemampuan Matematis Rendah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berbentuk PISA. Aksioma, 8(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i21839

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the21th Century. London: Libraries Unlimited.

Kuster, G., Johnson, E., Keene, K., & Andrews-larson, C. (2017). Inquiry-oriented instruction: A conceptualisation of the instructional principles. PRIMUS, 1970(August). https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1338807

Matthew, B., & Kenneth, I. O. (2013). a Study on the Effects of Guided Inquiry Teaching Method on Students Achievement in Logic. International Researcher, 2(1), 135–140.

Moretti, G. A. S., & Frandell, T. (2013). Literacy from a Right to Education Perspective.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 (Volume 1): What Students Know and Can Do. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en.

OECD. (2017). PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework: Reading, Mathematics and Science, Preliminary Version(Preliminary). Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Result in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm.

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Vols. I –V.Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2009keyfindings.htm

Privitera, G. J., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2018). Research methods for education. New York, NY: Sage Publishing.

Sulistyowaty, R. K., & Prafianti, R. A. (2017). Implementation of Inquiry Strategy on Exponent, Roots and Logarithm Implementation of Inquiry Strategy on Exponent, Roots and Logarithm. Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER, 1–5. https://doi.org/doi :10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012078

Toth, E. E., Ludvico, L. R., & Morrow, B. L. (2014). Blended inquiry with hands-on and virtual laboratories: the role of perceptual features during knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(5), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.693102

Ural, E. (2016). The Effect of Guided-Inquiry Laboratory Experiments on Science Education Students’ Chemistry Laboratory Attitudes, Anxiety and Achievement. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i4.1395

Wang, J. J., Rodr, J. R., Maxwell, E. J., & Algar, W. R. (2016). Build Your Own Photometer: A Guided-Inquiry Experiment to Introduce Analytical Instrumentation. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00426




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v10i2.109

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indexed by:

      


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org


p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

 Supported by: