Investigating Mathematical Knowledge of Teaching for Secondary Preservice Teachers in Papua New Guinea

Murray Olowa

Abstract


This article examines the studies investigating the teacher’s mathematics knowledge  of teaching  by  secondary  preservice teachers  in Papua  New  Guinea. Previous  research  on Mathematics  Knowledge  for  Teaching  provided  support  for  the  study.  This  study  was conducted  in  recognition  of  the  ongoing  problems  with Papua  New  Guinea's  curriculum, particularly the  teaching  of  science  and  mathematics,  which  have  led  to  a  drop  in  students' performance  in  these  subjects.  Subject  Matter  Knowledge  (SMK)  and  Pedagogical  Content Knowledge  (PCK)  are  the  two  main  domains  that  have  been  identified.  These  domains  are further  subdivided  into  Knowledge  of  Content  and  Students  (KCS),  Knowledge  of  Content and Teaching (KCT), and Knowledge of Content and Curriculum (KCC), respectively. Other subdivided   areas   include   Common   Content   Knowledge   (CCK),   Specialized   Content Knowledge  (SCK),  and  Horizon  Content  Knowledge  (HCK).  To determine  the  relationship between  SMK  and  PCK,  research  questionnaires  were  utilized  as  instruments  that  could accommodate  the  various  areas  of  SMK  and  PCK. Given  that  the  P-value  is  0.22>0.05,  the study's  findings  indicate  a  marginally  significant  difference  in  SMK  between  years  one  and four.  However,  since  the  P-value  was  0.007<0.05,  it  was  discovered  that  year  fours  have higher  PCK  than  year  one.  Ultimately,  the  study  has  demonstrated  that  fourth  years  have higher   MKT   than   first   years.   The   diligent   work   of   final-yearpreservice   teachers   in mathematics  is  what  caused  this  difference.  It  is  advised  that  the  mathematics  curricula  in teacher  colleges  be  reviewed  following the  findings  and  expanded  to  include  material  on SMK  and  PCK. The  Secondary  Teachers  College  Program  Specification  Document  must include both what and how to teach mathematics.


Keywords


Mathematics Knowledge; Probability; Preservice Teachers; Papua New Guinea; Pedagogical Knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arum, A., Kusmayadi, T., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Students' difficulties in probabilistic problem-solving. Journal of PhysicsConference Series, 983(1), 012098.

Asimi, K. T. (2014). Outcome based education with special reference to the International Agency in PNG. Comtemporary PNG Studies, 20, 103-110.

Astuti, D., Anggraeni,L.,&Setyawan, F. (2020). Mathematical probability: Student’s misconception in highereducation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1), 012009.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. What makes it special?. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5). 389-407.

Barrett,D., & Green,K. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge as a foundation for an interdisplinary graduate program. Science Educator, 18(1), 17-28.

Boland, P., & Nicholson, J. (1996). The statistics and probability curriculum at the secondary school levelin the USA,Ireland and the UK. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D:The Statistician,45(4),437-446.

Chapman, O. (2013). Investigating teachers' knowledge for teaching mathematics. Journal of MathematicsTeacher Education, 16(4), 238-240.

Committee, N. E. (2004 -2014). A National Plan for Education . Papua New Guinea Department of Education , 4.

Ding, M. (2016). Developing preservice elementary teachers' specialized content knowledge : The case of associative property. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1-19.

Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implication for reasearch. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1),44-63.

Hill, H.C., Ball, D.L., & Schilling, S.G., (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers' topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400.

Hurrell, D. P. (2013). What teachers need to know to teach mathematics: An argument for a reconceptualised model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 54-64.

Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A.(2008). Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Content Knowledge of Secondary Teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716.

Kulm,S.G & Wu,Z. (2004). The pedagogical content knowledge of middle school, mathematics teachersin China and USA. Netherlands. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(2), 146-149.

Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M.(2018). Mathematics teachers' subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75-90.

Meleisea, E., Matsumoto, T., & Tang-on, U. (2015). Pacific Islands Literacy and Numeracy Assessment (PILNA): United Nations Educational,Scientific and Cultural Organization. Pacific Education for All.

Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M.(2009). Mathematics knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn?.Journal for Research in MathematicsEducation, 40(5), 491-529.

Niemelä, M., & Tirri, K. (2018). Teachers' knowledge of curriculum integration: A current challenge for Finish subject teachers. Contemporary Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Development, 119-132.

Plan, C. (2019). Corporate plan (2019-2021). Education Department.Program Specification Document(2020). Mathematics and Physics Program Specification Document. St Peter Chanel Secondary Teacher Education College, 23-27.

Puspitasari, N., Afriansyah, E.A., Nuraeni, R., Madio, S.S, & Margana2, A. (2019). What are the difficulties in statistics and probability. Journal of Physics:Conference Series 14020(7), 077092.

Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand:Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1-23.

Sinebare, M. (2014, August 11). Outcome based and objective based education. The National NewsPaper. https://www.thenational.com.pg/outcomes-based-education-and-objectives-based-education/

Smestad, B., Jankvist, U. T.&Clark, K. M., (2014). Teachers mathematical knowledge for teaching in relation to the inclusion of mathematics in teaching. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 19(3-4), 169-183.

Speer, N.M, King, K.D, & Howell, H. (2015). Definition of mathematical knowledge for teaching: Using these constructs in research on Secondary and college mathematics teachers.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 105-122.

Steele, M. (2013). Exploring mathematics knowledge for teaching geometry and measurement through the design and use of rich assessment tasks. JournalMathematicsTeacher Education, 245-268.

Thabane, R. W. (2015). Deconstructing teacher content and pedagogical knowledge in mathematics and science curricula in teacher education in South Africa. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Central University of Technology.

Turnuklu,E & Yesildere. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Pre-service primary mathematics teachers' perspectivesin Turkey. Issues in the Undergraduate MathematicsPreparation of SchoolTeachers, 1,1-3.

UNESCO. (2019). IIEP Policy Toolbox. https://policytoolbox.iiep.unesco.org/policy-option/textbook-availability-and-content




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v13i2.178

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indexed by:

      


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org


p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

 Supported by: