Fostering Ethnomathematics in Projective Geometry: A Hypnoteaching Framework for Effective Distance Learning

Jafaruddin Jafaruddin, Wen-Haw Chen

Abstract


This  study  evaluated  the  impact  of  integrating  students'  cultural  backgrounds  into  online learning to improve understanding and participation. It employed "Simple House Theory" and projective  geometry  in  designing  traditional  houses  to  make  complex  mathematical  concepts relatable. The Ethnomathematics project and the Hypnoteaching model were two instructional strategies  that  successfully  enhanced  active  student  participation  in  distance  learning.Data was  collected  from  a  joint  course  between Universitas  Negeri  Makassar  (UNM  Makassar), Indonesia,  and Tunghai  University,  Taiwan.  The  study  involved  36  students:  20  from  UNM Makassar’s international mathematics education program (Group I) and 16 from Tunghai University’s applied mathematics department (Group II). Various tools like surveys, tests, and projects  were  employed  for  data  collection.  The  survey  had  23  Likert-scale  questions, allowing a thorough evaluation of student feedback. Quantitative analysis of this data revealed that   incorporating   the Ethnomathematics   projects   and   Hypnoteaching   model   into   the curriculum significantly  increased  student  engagement  in  remote  learning.  This  was  further evidenced  by  improved  student  performance  in  project  work.  The  research  underscores  the benefits of culturally relevant teaching  methods in enhancing engagement and understanding in  online  mathematics  education.  It  highlights  the  effectiveness  of  embedding  local  cultural elements into online learning environments, creating more engaging and relatable experiences. The  study  suggests  the  potential  of  these  approaches  in  other  educational  contexts  and disciplines for future research.


Keywords


: Hypnoteaching, Distance Learning, Projective Geometry, Simple House Theory, Projective Coordinates.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adam, N. A. (2011). Weaving Culture and Mathematics. Auckland: The University of Auckland.

Ali, M., & Hassan, N. (2018). Defining Concepts of Student Engagement and Factors Contributing to Their Engagement in Schools. Creative Education, 9, 2161-2170. doi: 10.4236/ce.2018.914157.

Bacich, L. N., & Trevisani, F. d. (2015). Ensino Hı´brido: Personalizac¸a˜o e Tecnologia na Educac¸a˜o. Porto Alegre-RS: Penso Editora.

Bozkurt, A. (2019). From Distance Education to Open and Distance Learning: A Holistic Evaluation of History, Definitions, and Theories. In S. Sisman-Ugur, & G. Kurubacak, Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp. 252–273). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thingking to Maximise your Brain's. London: BBC Books.

Chen, W.-H., & Ja’faruddin. (2021). Traditional Houses and Projective Geometry: Building Numbers and Projective Coordinates. Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2021, Article ID 9928900, 25 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9928900.

Coates, H. (2006). Student Engagement in Campus-based and Online Education. New York: Routledge.

Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood.

Conrad, R.-M., & Donaldson, J. A. (2004). Engaging the Online Learner: Activities and Resources for Creative Instruction. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

D’Ambrosio, U. (2016). An Overview of the History of Ethnomathematics. In M. Rosa, U. D’Ambrosio, D. C. Orey, L. Shirley, W. V. Alangui, P. Palhares, & M. E. Gavarrete, Current and Future Perspectives of Ethnomathematics as a Program (pp. 5-10). Hamburg, Germany: Springer Nature.

D'Ambrosio. (1999). A Trivium for Today. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. In D'Ambrosio, Literacy, Matheracy, and Technoracy (pp. 131-153). DOI:10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_3.

D'Ambrosio, U. (2001). What is Ethnomathematics, and How Can It Help Children in Schools? Teaching Children Mathematics, Feb., 2001, V7 (6), pp.308-311

Febrianti, W., Fransiskus, D., & Tjhin, V. U. (2017). How active are K-12 students using Edmodo as online motivation, interaction and collaboration tools for learning process? 2017 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI). DOI:10.1109/HSI.2017.8005005.

Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In W. Damon, & R. L. (Eds.), Theoretical models of human development, Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1) (pp. 319–399). New York: Wiley.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.

Ja’faruddin, Upu, H., Chen, W.-H., & Teng, D. C.-E. (2020). The Comparison between Two Hypnoteaching Models in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0607. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8480.

Ja'faruddin. (2014b). Hypnoteaching as A Teaching Model. International Confrence on Mathematics , Science, Technology, Education and Their Application; ISBN:979-604-151-0. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makssar.

Ja'faruddin. (2021). Ethnomathematics Projects for Topology Projective and Geometry in Distance Learning. The 1st ICoESM 2021. Makassar, Indonesia: ICoESM 2021.

Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The effects of student-faculty interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education: Journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, 24(3), 309-332. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2001.0005

Kinasevych, O. (2010). The effect of the Culture on Online Learning. Cultural Attitudes Towards Communication and Technology (pp. 420-427). Australia: Murdoch University, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529665.pdf.

Lerner, R. M., & Callina, K. S. (2013). Relational developmental systems theories and the ecological validity of experimental designs. Commentary on Freund and Isaacowitz. Human Development, 56(6), 372–380. doi:10.1159/000357179 .

Morse, A. B. (2004). School Complementation and Student Engagement: Information and Strategies for Parents. In I. A. Canter, L. Z. Paige, M. D. Roth, I. Romero, & S. A. Carroll, Helping Children at Home and at School II: Handouts for Families and Educators (pp. S2-69-S2-71). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2000). Making the transition: Helping teachers to teach online. Paper presented at EDUCAUSE: Thinking it through. Nashville,Tennessee. . ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 452 806.

Pauk, W., & Owens, R. J. (2005). How to Study in College. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Powell, A., & Frankenstein, M. (1997). Ethnomathematics: Challenging Eurocentrism in Mathematics Education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Rosa, M., & Shirley, L. (2016). Introduction. In M. Rosa, U. D’Ambrosio, D. C. Orey, L. Shirley, W. V. Alangui, P. Palhares, & M. E. Gavarrete, Current and Future Perspectives of Ethnomathematics as a Program (pp. 1-3). Hamburg: Springer Nature.

Rose, T. R., & Fischer, K. W. (2013). The science of the individual. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3). https://lsi.gse.harvard.edu/files/gse-individuality/files/roserouhanifischer2013.pdf.

Sagdic, Z. (2006). Mathematical Connection in Art, Music and Science. In Bridges London (pp. 269-276). Tarquin Publications.

Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Suharta, I. G., & Astawa, I. G. (2017). Ethnomathematics of Balinese Traditional Houses. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research (IRJEIS), 42-50.

Syarif, A. Y. (2018). Sulapa Eppa As The Basic or Fundamental Philosophy of Traditional Architecture Buginese. International Conference on Architectural Education in Asia (eduARCHsia 2017). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: eduARCHsia.

Teng, K. (2016, November 6). The Culture SG. (The Culture .sg) Retrieved 6 7, 2019, from The Culture website: https://theculture.sg/2016/11/assess-the-view-that-traditional-buildings-have-no-future-in-your-society/

Thomas, A., & Thorne, G. (2010). How to Increase Higher Order Thinking. Metarie, LA: Center for Development and Learning.

Threlkeld, R., & Brezoska, K. (1994). Research in distance education. In B. (. Willis, Distance Education Strategies and Tools. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.

Weigel, V. B. (2002). Deep Learning for a Digital Age. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Yanuarto, W. N. (2017). Ethnic vs Math: The Secret inside Borobudur Temple, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(1), 75-82; DOI: 10.11591/edulearn.v11i1.4297.

Yudohusodo, S. (2007, 2 28). Rumah untuk seluruh rakyat. Jakarta, Indonesia: INKOPPOL, Unit Percetakan Bharakerta. Retrieved 7 15, 2019, from Wikipedia: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumah_tradisional

Zhang, W., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Ethnomathematics and Its Integration within the Mathematics Curriculum. Journal of Mathematics Education, 151-157.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v13i2.240

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indexed by:

      


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org


p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

 Supported by: