Exploring Challenges in Integrating ICT in Secondary Mathematics with TPACK

Dorian Stoilescu


This paper describes challenges encountered by three experienced secondary mathematics teachers when they try to integrate ICT in their classrooms. This study is based on the four dimension framework developed by Niess: 1) overarching conceptions of integrating ICT, 2) knowledge of instructional strategies and representations for teaching, 3) knowledge of students’ knowledge of technology; and 4) knowledge of curriculum and curriculum materials that integrate technology with learning. By using this analysis, we explore the challenges that teachers face on each of the four levels of integration ICT and suggest ways
of improving these strategies in mathematical instruction.


Integrating ICT in mathematics; mathematics secondary teachers; teacher professional development; Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Full Text:



Anderson, J. R. (1992). Intelligent tutoring and high school mathematics. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intelligence Tutoring Systems (pp. 1–10). Montreal:Springer-Verlag.

Calvert, L. G., Zack, V., & Mura, R. (2001). Children’s Proving. Proceedings from Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group, Annual Meeting, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, May 25 – 29, (pp. 41-46).

Cavanagh, M., & Mitchelmore, M. (2000). Student misconceptions in interpreting basic calculator display. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.) Proceedings of the 24th PME International Conference, vol. 2, 161-168.

Chazan, D. (1999). On teachers' mathematical knowledge and student exploration: A personal story about teaching a technologically supported approach to school algebra. Journal International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 4(2), 121-149.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Dreyfus, A. (1993). Selecting Appropriate Strategies for Laboratory Teaching: a Problem in Teacher Training. European Journal of Teacher Education, 16(3), 257-270.

Drijvers, P, Kieran, C & Mariotti, M.A. (2000). In C. Hoyles & J.B.Lagrange (Eds.) Mathematics education and technology-Rethinking the Terrain (pp. 89-132. New York:Springer.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

Fuglestad, A. B., Healy, L., Kynigos, C., & Monaghan, J. (2010). Working with teachers:Context and culture. In C. Hoyles & J. B.Lagrange (Eds.) Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain (pp. 293-310). New York: Springer.

Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000) Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal,12,303-320.

Hershkowitz, R., & Kieran, C. (2001). Algorithmic and meaningful ways of joining together representatives within the same mathematical activity: An experience with graphing calculators. In Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 1-96).

Hodgson, B. (1996). The roles and needs of mathematics teachers using IT. In D. Watson & D. Tinsley (Eds.) Integrating Information Technology into Education, (pp. 27-37). Chapman & Hall, London, UK.

Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2003). What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education? In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick and F. Leung (Eds), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 323–349). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Gopalakrishnan, A. (2006). Supporting technology integration in adult education: Critical issues and models. Adult Basic Education: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Adult Literacy Educational Planning, 16(1), 39-56.

Grandgenett, N. F. (2008). Perhaps a matter of imagination: TPCK in mathematics education. In AECT Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 145-165). New York: Routledge.

Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Visual and Symbolic Reasoning in Mathematics: Making Connections With Computers?. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 59-84.

Heid, K. (2005). Technology in mathematics education: tapping into visions of the future. In W. J. Masalski (Ed.), Technology-Supported Mathematics Learning Environments:NCTM 67th Yearbook. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning:Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research Development, 55, 223–252.

Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In Grouws D. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan. pp. 515-556.

Kaput, J., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2008). Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the Computational Era. In English, L. (Ed) Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, (pp. 693-715). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kaput, J., & Shaffer, D. W. (2002). On the development of human representational competence from an evolutionary point of view: From episodic to virtual culture. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 269–286). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.

Kaput, J., & Thompson, P. W. (1994). Technology in mathematics education research: The first 25 years in the JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 676-684. Retrieved at April 28 2009 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/749579b

Kelly, D., & Tangney, B. (2006). Adapting to intelligence profile in an adaptive educational system. Interacting with Computers, 18(3), 385-409.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Li, Q. (2007). Student and Teacher Views about Technology: A Tale of Two Cities? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 377-397

Magala, S. (2006). Virtual blood, real media, Kritikos, 3. Retrieved July 22, 2010 from http://intertheory.org/magala.htm

Maor, D. (2003). The teachers’ role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Education Media International, 40 (1/2), 127-137.

McCrory, R. S. (2006). Technology and teaching: A new kind of Knowledge. In E. A. Ashburn ans R. E. Floden (Eds.) Meaningful Learning using Technology (pp. 141- 160). New York: Teachers College Press Columbia University.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2214-2226). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Mishra, P., & Koehler. M. J. (2008). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Proceeding for the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, March 24–28, 2008.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). The Technology Principle. Retrieved June 24, 2014 from http://standards.nctm.org/document/chapter2/techn.htm

Niess, M. L. (2008). Guiding preservice teachers in developing TPCK. In AECT Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 223-250). New York: Rutledge.

Plair, S. K. (2008). Revamping professional development for technology integration and fluency. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 82(2), 70-74.

Rogers, E. M. (1996). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

Ronau, R. N., Niess, M. L., Browning, C. A, Pugalee, D., Driskell, S. O &. Harrington, R. (2008). Framing the research on digital technologies and student learning in mathematics. In L. Bell, L. Schrum, & A. D. Thompson (Eds.) Framing the research on technology and student learning in the content areas (pp. 13-31). Information Age Publishing, Charlotte: NC.

Sangwin, C., Cazes, C., Lee, A. & Wong, K. L. (2010). Micro-level automatic assessment supported by digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J. B.Lagrange (Eds.) Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain (pp. 227-250). Springer US.

Stoilescu, D. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Technology. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

Stoilescu, D. (forthcoming). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: Case studies of secondary school mathematics teachers' use of technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research.

Stoilescu, D. (forthcoming). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: Secondary school mathematics teachers’ use of technology. Fields Mathematics Education Journal.

Sugar, W., Crawley, F., & Fine, B. (2004). Examining Teachers' Decisions To Adopt New Technology. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 201-213.

Van Herwaarden, O., & Gielen., J. (2002). An approach for the effective integration of computer algebra in an undergraduate calculus and linear algebra course. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics, Hersonissos, Creta, Greece.

Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Research Division, Educational Testing Service.

Yerushalmy, M. (1999). Making Exploration Visible: On Software Design and School Algebra Curriculum. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 4(2-3), 169-189.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v4i1.28


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Indexed by:


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org

p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546

Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

 Supported by: