Re-engaging with Primary Mathematics Through Sustained Professional Development: A Case Study

Catherine Attard

Abstract


This paper reports on aspects of a case study of sustained professional development to improve teacher and student engagement with mathematics. Teachers from Grades 3 to 6 in one Western Sydney primary school were involved with a professional development program over the course of 18 months. Prior to this, the teachers limited opportunities to engage with any mathematics-related professional development. The professional development program resulted in improved teacher engagement and the development of a community of practice within the school. Findings from the study align with recommendations from literature that teachers must be provided with opportunities for continuing professional development that is self-nominated and focused on individual needs as well as group needs.


Keywords


professional development; primary school; primary mathematics; teacher engagement; community of practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Attard, C. (2011). The influence of teachers on student engagement with mathematics during the middle years. Paper presented at the 34th Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Alice Springs, NT.

Attard, C. (2012). The influence of pedagogy on student engagement with mathematics during the middle years of schooling. In A. L. White, & U. H. Cheah (Eds.), Transforming school mathematics education in the 21st century (pp. 140-157). Penang: SEAMEO RECSAM.

Attard, C. (2014). "I don't like it, I don't love it, but I do it and I don't mind": Introducing a framework for engagement with mathematics. Curriculum Perspectives, 34(3), 1-14.

Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (2013). AAMT position paper on professional learning. Retrieved from http://www.aamt.edu.au/Publications-and-statements/Position-statements/Professional-Learning

Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority. (2017). Australian curriculum: Mathematics F-10. Retrieved from

http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Mathematics/Curriculum/F-10

Ball, D. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 500-508.

Board of Studies New South Wales. (2012). Mathematics K-10 syllabus. Retrieved from http://syllabus.bos.nsw.edu.au/

Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.

Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). National numeracy review report. Retrieved from:http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A19994

Cwikla, J. (2007). The trials of a poor middle school trying to catch up in mathematics:Teachers' multiple communities of practice and the boundary encounters. Education and Urban Society, 39(4), 554-583.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.

Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.

Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development:Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.

Fair Go Team NSW Department of Education and Training. (2006). School is for me:Pathways to student engagement. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training, Sydney, Australia.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59 -110.

Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.

Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching:Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381-391.

Higgins, J., & Parsons, R. (2011). Professional learning opportunities in the classroom:Implications for scaling up system-level professional development in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 54-76.

King, F. (2014). Evaluating the impact of teacher professional development: an evidencebased framework. Professional Development in Education, 40(1), 89-111.

Lave, J, & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge.

Lee, H. (2007). Developing an effective professional development model to enhance teachers' conceptual understanding and pedagogical strategies in mathematics. Journal of Educational Thought, 41(2), 125.

Mayer, D, & Lloyd, M. (2011). Professional learning: an introduction to the research literature. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, Melbourne. Prepared in partnership with Deakin University and the Queensland University of Technology. ISBN, 978-970.

Munns, G, & Martin, A. J. (2005). It's all about MeE: A motivation and engagement framework. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Academic Research Focus Conference, Cairns. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/mun05400.pdf

Rim-Kaufman, S., Baroody, A., Larsen, R. Curby, T., & Abry, T. (2014). To what extend do teacher-student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170-175.

Santagata, R., Kersting, N., Givvin, K., & Stigler, J. (2010). Problem implementation as a lever for change: An experimental study of the effects of a professional development program on students’ mathematics learning. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(1), 1-24.

Wayne, A., Yoon, K., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 469-479.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E. (n.d.). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/theory/




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v7i1.41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indexed by:

     


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org


p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

Supported by: