Mathematics Literacy: An Australian Perspective and Experience

Allan Leslie White

Abstract


A brief listing of five different types of mathematical literacy is provided. The definition used by the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is selected and some brief remarks are provided on this program. The performance of Australian students is examined which shows that at the beginning of the new century 2000, Australian educators were feeling comfortable and reasonably satisfied with student performance but by 2016
there was great concern over a consistent decline. The reasons for this decline are briefly discussed with the focus on Australian governmental policies that followed the directions of reform in the United States and Great Britain, and what has been labelled GERM. Current policies have been tried and failed and it is time to look for alternatives. While it is not wise to just copy the programs and policies of another country rather than adapt them due to differences in culture, population diversity, and other factors, nevertheless countries such as Finland can offer alternative paths to be explored. In Australia’s case it would also seem to be unwise to adopt policies and programs of countries who perform worse than it.


Keywords


mathematical literacy; PISA; GERM; TIMSS; high-stakes testing; Finland; market-driven policies; MaRWA; NAPLAN

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jablonka, A. (2003). Mathematical Literacy. In A.J. Bishop, M.A. Clements, C. Keitel, J.Kilpatrick, & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75-102). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hargreaves, A. (2011). Foreword: Unfinished business. In P. Sahlberg, Finnish lessons (pp.xv-xx). New York: Teachers College Press.

Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1998). Cultural contexts of schooling revisited: A review of the learning gap from a cultural psychology perspective. In S. G. Paris, & H. M. Wellman (Eds.), Global prospects for education development, culture and schooling (pp. 79-104). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Kilpatrick, J. (2013). Introduction to section D: International perspectives on mathematics education. In M.A. Clements, A.J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F.K.S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 791-795). New York: Springer.

Lingard, B., Sellar, S., Hogan, A., & Thompson, G. (2017). Commercialisation in public schooling (CIPS). Sydney: New South Wales Teachers Federation.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). PISA 2000 technical report. Paris: OECD.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. Paris: OECD.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/35/37464175.pdf

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. Paris: Author.

Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. New York: Teachers College Press.

Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Indonesian Mathematics Society Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95-126.

Sjøberg, S. (2007). PISA and “real life challenges”: mission impossible? In S.T. Hopmann, G. Brinek, & M. Retzl, (Eds.), PISA according to PISA, does PISA keep what it promises? (pp. 1-18). Wien: LIT Verlag.

Thomson, S., & Fleming, N. (2004). Summing it up: Mathematics achievement in Australian schools in TIMMS 2002, (TIMMS Australia Monograph No 6). Camberwell, Victoria:ACER.

Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & De Bortoli, L. (2013). A teacher’s guide to PISA mathematical literacy. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.

Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2016). PISA 2015: A first look at Australia’s results. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press

Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2017). PISA 2015: Reporting Australia's results. Retrieved from: http://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/22

White, A. L. (2013). Literacy and mathematics. In R. Gregson (Ed.), Literacy across the curriculum (pp. 34-51). Illinois, USA: Common Ground Publishing.

Willis, S. (1990). Numeracy and society: the shifting ground. Being numerate: what counts (Ed.). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Wu, M. (2008). A Comparison of PISA and TIMSS 2003 achievement results in mathematics and science. Paper presented at the 3rd IEA Research Conference, Taipei.

Zhao, Y. (2009). Catching up or leading the way: American education in the age of globalisation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v7i1.43

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indexed by:

     


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org


p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

Supported by: