Mathematical Investigation Proficiency among Singapore Secondary School Students: An Exploratory Study

Joseph B. W. YEO

Abstract


This article presents an exploratory study to find out whether high-ability secondary school students in Singapore were able to deal with open mathematical investigative tasks. A class of Secondary One (or Grade 7) students, who had no prior experience with this kind of investigation, were given a paper-and-pencil test consisting of four open tasks. The results show that these students did not even know how to begin, despite sample questions being given in the first two tasks to guide and help them pose their own problems. The main difficulty was the inability to understand the task requirement: what does it mean to investigate? Another issue was the difference between searching for any patterns without a specific problem to solve, and searching for patterns to solve a given problem. The implications of these findings on teaching and on research methodologies that rely on paper-and-pencil test instruments will also be discussed.


Keywords


Mathematical investigation; open investigative tasks; thinking processes; research methodologies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Australian Education Council. (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

Bailey, J. (2007). Mathematical investigations: A primary teacher educator’s narrative journey of professional awareness. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA): Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (Vol. 1, pp. 103-112).

Adelaide, South Australia: MERGA.

Cai, J., & Cifarelli, V. (2005). Exploring mathematical exploration: How two college students formulated and solve their own mathematical problems. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 27(3), 43-72.

Christiansen, B., and Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education: Papers submitted by members of the Bacomet Group (pp. 243-307). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.

Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics counts: Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools under the chairmanship of Dr W H Cockcroft. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO).

Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Falmer Press.

Evans, J. (1987). Investigations: The state of the art. Mathematics in School, 16(1), 27-30.

Frobisher, L. (1994). Problems, investigations and an investigative approach. In A. Orton & G. Wain (Eds.), Issues in teaching mathematics (pp. 150-173). London: Cassell.

HMI. (1985). Mathematics from 5 to 16. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (or HMSO).

Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press.

Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. In J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirszup (Series Eds.), Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.

Lee, M., & Miller, M. (1997). Real-life math investigations: 30 activities that help students apply mathematical thinking to real-life situations. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.

Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1985). Thinking mathematically (Rev. ed.). Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.

Ministry of Education of Singapore. (2000). Mathematics syllabus: Lower secondary. Singapore: Curriculum Planning and Development Division.

Ng, H. C. (2003). Benefits of using investigative tasks in the primary classroom. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Orton, A., & Frobisher, L. (1996). Insights into teaching mathematics. London: Cassell.

Pirie, S. (1987). Mathematical investigations in your classroom: A guide for teachers. Basingstoke. UK: Macmillan.

Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Tanner, H. (1989). Introducing investigations. Mathematics Teaching, 127, 20-23.

Yeo, J. B. W. (2008). Pre-Service teachers engaging in mathematical investigation. In Electronic Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association (APERA) Conference 2008: Educational Research for Innovation & Quality in Education: Policy & Pedagogical Engagements Across Contexts. Singapore: APERA and Educational Research Association of Singapore (ERAS).

Yeo, J. B. W., & Yeap, B. H. (2010). Characterising the cognitive processes in mathematical investigation. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning: online journal available at http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v4i1.26

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

      

Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org

p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546

Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
View My Stats

 Supported by: