Juggling Mathematical Understanding

Allan Leslie White

Abstract


This paper presents a theoretical model for the teaching for understanding of school mathematics. After describing two categories of understanding, it develops a continuum between rote and insight. In the process of describing the model, it articulates the assumptions underpinning the model and presents a process whereby a teacher can move the teaching strategies towards the development of insight within the students. It will argue that the development of insight should be the goal of all school mathematics classrooms. And that in order to achieve this goal the classroom teacher must become an expert juggler by simultaneously applying teaching strategies that develop student proficiency with skills, positive attitudes towards mathematics and deep connected conceptual knowledge.


Keywords


school mathematics; teaching for understanding; instrumental understanding; rote memorization; relational understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brousseau, G. (1984). The crucial role of the didactical contract in the analysis and construction of situations in teaching and learning mathematics. In H. G. Steiner (Ed.), Theory of mathematics education (pp. 110−119). Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.

Crowe, F. E., & Doran, R. M. (1957)(Eds.). Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan. Insight: A study of human understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 6-33.

Leung, F. K. S. (2014). What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 579-605.

Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20-26.

Skemp, R. (1977). Professor Richard Skemp, interview by Michael Worboys. Mathematics in School, 6 (2), 14-15.

Skemp, R. (1979). Intelligence, learning and action. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

Skemp, R. (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics (2nd ed). London: Penguin Books.

Skemp, R. (1989). Mathematics in the primary school. London: Routledge.

Skemp, R. (1992). Bringing theory into the classroom: The school as a learning environment for teachers. In B. Southwell, B. Perry, & K. Owens (Eds.). Space - The first and final frontier, conference proceedings, fifteenth annual conference of the mathematical education research group of Australia (pp. 44-54). UWS Nepean, Sydney: MERGA.

Sousa, D. A. (2008). How the brain learns mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and Insight: A theory of mathematics education. Sydney: Developmental Psychological Series, Academic Press Inc.

Watts, D., & McNaught, K. (2012). Rote is an essential feature of teaching and learning. Professional Educator, 11(4), 6-8.

White, A. L. (2011). School mathematics teachers are super heroes. South East Asia Mathematics Education Journal, 1(1), 3-17.

White, A. L. (2013). Mathematics education research food for thought with flavours from Asia. South East Asia Mathematics Education Journal, 3(1), 55-71.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v4i1.29

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

      

Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org

p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546

Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
View My Stats

 Supported by: