Elementary School Teachers' Skills in Integrating STEM Education

Nur Choiro Siregar

Abstract


Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is the principal capital to improve the nation's economic dignity. Students' STEM abilities must be different from the role of teachers as facilitators in the learning process at school. The ability of elementary school teachers to apply STEM approaches is critical, especially in mathematics and natural sciences (IPA) studies. The study aims to identify how elementary school teachers are integrating STEM approaches. We used a qualitative case study research method, conducting in-depth interviews with two math teachers and two science teachers from the city and the village. The findings suggest differences in teachers' ability to apply STEM approaches during classroom instruction. Three aspects affect this difference: (1) lack of teacher professional development (training, seminars, or workshops); (2) facilities for obtaining information (equipment such as laboratories and computers); and (3)  different abilities of students (intellectual intelligence). There are differences in the ability of teachers in urban and rural areas to implement STEM approaches. Teachers who teach in villages have limited knowledge of integrated STEM; internal and external factors greatly influence the differences. Therefore, policymakers must undertake more programs and activities to develop their ability to implement STEM approaches. We suggest further research to explore the factors that affect teachers' ability to integrate STEM. We discuss the limitations and implications of this study.


References


Adhelacahya, K., Soekarmin, S., & Sarwanto, S. (2023). Integrating the problem-based learning electronic module with STEM impacts students' critical thinking skills. Science Education Research Journal, 9(7), 4869–4878. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.3931

Avery, Z.K., & Reeve, E.M. (2013). Develop effective STEM professional development programs. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4

Bakar, N.S.A, Maat, S.M., & Rosli, R. (2020). Self-efficacy of mathematics teachers, technology integration, and knowledge of pedagogical content of technology. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10818.259-276

Bakker, C., de Glopper, K., & de Vries, S. (2022). Paying attention to reasoning in the lesson study team is important in early teacher education. Teacher Teaching and Education, 113(2022), 103656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103656

Burton, M., Maiorca, C., & Tripp, L.O. (2022). The relationship between teacher candidates' affective disposition and STEM instructional planning actions. Educational Sciences, 12(82), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020082

Coccia, M. (2020). Fishbone diagram for technology analysis and foresight. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 14(2–4), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijfip.2020.111221

Dung, T.M., Thu Huong, V.N., & Thi Nga, N. (2020). STEM teachers and education: Cross-disciplinary collaboration and lesson implementation in two areas of study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4122–4128. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080938

Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2016). STEM teaching and learning: A practical guide. In Jossey Bass. https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.3556

Lee, I., & Perret, B. (2022). We are preparing high school teachers to integrate AI methods into STEM classrooms. Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022, 36, 12783–12791. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21557

Manokarn, M., & Chamrat, S. (2022). A learning management model with a STEM-focused career for students in a multicultural society. Journal of Community Development ..., 15(2), 85–97. https://www.journal.nu.ac.th/JCDR/article/view/Vol-15-No-2-2022-85-97

Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F.J., & Vílchez-González, J.M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? Literature review. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522

Mateos-Núñez, M., Martínez-Borreguero, G., & Naranjo-Correa, F.L. (2020). Science learning in primary education with STEM workshops: An analysis of teaching effectiveness from cognitive and emotional perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083095

Nguyen, T. (2019). STEM/STEAM education: From straight to mind. Tre Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-8-5-18

O'Leary, E.S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H.W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Create inclusive classrooms by involving STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00230-7

Patel, A. (2024). Exploring gender roles, race, first-year college GPA, passing the stem advanced placement exam, and possibly graduating with a stem degree: Multiple logistic regression analysis. Master's Thesis & Specialist Project. Paper 3740. Https://Digitalcommons.Wku.Edu/Theses/3740.

Rahman, N.A., Rosli, R., Rambely, A.S., Siregar, N.C., Capraro, M.M., & Capraro, M.M. (2022). Secondary school teachers' perception of STEM pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp119-134

Rosli, R., & Siregar, N.C. (2022). Professional development in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Contemporary Education Research, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33422/2nd.iaceducation.2020.10.32

Siregar, N.C., & Anggrayni, D. (2023). STEM-based social interaction model in building communication among residents of social institutions in the Bogor area. Axiom Journal, 12(1), 37–45.

Siregar, N.C., & Anggrayni, D. (2023). Facilitators are STEM-based in weather observation to determine prayer times. Axiom Journal, 12(1), 10–17.

Siregar, N.C., Rosli, R., Maat, S.M, & Capraro, M.M (2019). The Influence of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Programs on Student Achievement in Mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5885

Siregar, N.C., Rosli, R., & Marsigit. (2022). The science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning design is equipped with sample questions. KBM Indonesia.

Siregar, N.C., Rosli, R., & Nite, S. (2023). Students' interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is based on parental education and gender factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(2), em0736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13060

Soybean, D., Bani-Yaghoub, M., & Riggers-Piehl, T.A. (2022). Analysis of stem students' anxiety, motivation, and confidence during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(2), em0684. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11836

Supriani, Y., Meliani, F., Supriyadi, A., Supiana, S., & Zaqiah, Q.Y. (2022). Curriculum innovation process: Dimensions, models, stages, and influencing factors. Nazhruna: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i2.2235

Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2019). Teachers' attitudes towards integrated STEM teaching: The impact of personal background characteristics and school contexts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9898-7

VanTassel-Baska, J., & Wood, S. (2010). Integrated curriculum model (ICM). Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.006

What is STEM? (2020). Https://Www.Education.Wa.Edu.Au/En/What-Is-Stem. https://www.education.wa.edu.au/what-is-stem#%0Ahttps://www.education.wa.edu.au/what-is-stem

Widowati, C., Purwanto, A., & Akbar, Z. (2021). Integration of problem-based learning in STEM education to improve environmental literacy. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(7), 374. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i7.2836

Xinh, L.T., & van Hong, B. (2021). STEM teaching skills of elementary school teachers: The current situation in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. Journal of E-Learning Education and Research, 8(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.82.149.157

Zhou, D., Gomez, R., Wright, N., Rittenbruch, M., & Davis, J. (2022). The Australian context is a design-led conceptual framework for developing a school-integrated STEM program. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09619-5




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v14i2.380

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indexed by:

      


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org


p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546


Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

 Supported by: