Analysis Prospective Mathematics Teachers’ Lesson Planning: A Praxeological-Didactical Theory
Abstract
A high quality of lesson planning is the key to achieving effective learning. One of the characteristics of effective learning is that it minimizes learning obstacles. This study aims to explore an Indonesian prospective mathematics teacher’s lesson planning and identify its learning obstacles. Data was analyzed from the lesson plan document of prospective mathematics teacher students carrying out teaching practices at one of the high schools in Jakarta. Analysis was done using the praxeological-didactical (PDA) method. PDA offers space to analyze human actions, such as lesson plans. Four types of tasks are presented in the lesson plan on drawing graphs of quadratic functions. The predicted learning obstacles identified from the lesson plan are (1) epistemological obstacles, caused by the limitations of certain contexts; (2) ontogenic obstacles, caused by the presentation of tasks due to inappropriate prerequisites; and (3) didactic obstacles, caused by tasks that are not relevant to the next task. The implication is that the results of the study can be used to improve a quality lesson plan, and the use of a PDA can be a consideration for prospective mathematics teachers when designing a quality lesson plan.
Keywords
References
Akyuz, D., Dixon, J. K., & Stephan, M. (2013). Improving the quality of mathematics teaching with effective planning practices. Teacher Development, 17(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.753939
Aliustaoğlu, F., & Tuna, A. (2022). Analysis of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development of Prospective Teachers in the Lesson Plan Development Process: 4MAT Model. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.17
Barbé, J., Bosch, M., Espinoza, L., & Gascón, J. (2005). Didactic restrictions on the teacher’s practice: The case of limits of functions in Spanish high schools. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1–3), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-5889-z
Bosch, M., & Gascon, J. (2006). Twenty-Five Years of Didactic Transposition. ICMI Bulletin, 58, 51–63.
Bosch, M., Gascón, J., & Trigueros, M. (2017). Dialogue between theories interpreted as research praxeologies: the case of APOS and the ATD. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9734-3
Bosch, M., Hausberger, T., Kondratieva, M., & Winsløw, C. (2021). External Didactic Transposition in Undergraduate Mathematics. 140–162.
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. In Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
Chevallard, Y. (2019). On using the ATD: Some clarifications and comments. Educação Matemática Pesquisa : Revista Do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados Em Educação Matemática, 21, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2019v21i4p001-017
Chevallard, Y., Bosch, M., & Kim, S. (2015). What is a theory according to the Anthropological Theory of the Didactic? CERME 9: Thematic Working Group 17, Theoretical Perspectives and Approaches in Mathematics Educaction Research, January, 35–45. http://www.cerme9.org/
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Core Mixed Methods Design. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research Approach, 77–84.
de Grefte, J. (2023). Knowledge as Justified True Belief. Erkenntnis, 88(2), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00365-7
Durand-Guerrier, V., Winsløw, C., & Yoshida, H. (2010). A model of mathematics teacher knowledge and a comparative study in Denmark, France and Japan. Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, 15(2010), 147–172.
Emre-Akdoğan, E., & Yazgan-Sağ, G. (2018). An Investigation on How Prospective Mathematics Teachers Design a Lesson Plan. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.313310
Farhang, A. P. Q., Hashemi, A. P. S. S. A., & Ghorianfar, A. P. S. M. (2023). Lesson Plan and Its Importance in Teaching Process. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(08), 5901–5913. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i8-57
Fouryza, D., Amin, S. M., & Ekawati, R. (2019). Designing lesson plan of integer number operation based on fun and easy math (FEM) approach. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i1.15514
Fuster Guillen, D. E. (2019). Investigación cualitativa: Método fenomenológico hermenéutico. Propósitos y Representaciones, 7(1), 201. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2019.v7n1.267
García, F. J., Gascón, J., Higueras, L. R., & Bosch, M. (2006). Mathematical modelling as a tool for the connection of school mathematics. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(3), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652807
González-Martín, A. S., Giraldo, V., & Souto, A. M. (2013). The introduction of real numbers in secondary education: An institutional analysis of textbooks. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.803778
González, M. J., Gómez, P., & Pinzón, A. (2020). Characterising lesson planning: a case study with mathematics teachers. Teaching Education, 31(3), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1539071
HastiYunianta, T. N., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Herman, T. (2023). Textbook praxeological-didactical analysis: Lessons learned from the Indonesian mathematics textbook. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(3), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i3.pp503-524
Hendriyanto, A., Suryadi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Juandi, D. (2023). Praxeology review: Comparing Singaporean and Indonesian textbooks in introducing the concept of sets. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12953
Huang, X., Huang, R., & Bosch, M. (2021). Analyzing a teacher’s learning through cross-cultural collaboration: a praxeological perspective of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10057-w
Iqbal, M. H., Siddiqie, S. A., & Mazid, M. A. (2021). Rethinking theories of lesson plan for effective teaching and learning. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 4(1), 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100172
Kang, H. (2017). Preservice Teachers’ Learning to Plan Intellectually Challenging Tasks. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676313
Kilicoglu, E. (2019). Planning Skills of the Prospective Elementary Teachers in Mathematics Course To cite this article : Kilicoglu , E . ( 2019 ). Planning skills of the prospective elementary school teachers in Planning Skills of the Prospective Elementary School Teachers in.
König, J., Krepf, M., Bremerich-Vos, A., & Buchholtz, C. (2021). Meeting Cognitive Demands of Lesson Planning: Introducing the CODE-PLAN Model to Describe and Analyze Teachers’ Planning Competence. Teacher Educator, 56(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1938324
L.S Vygotsky, & Bakhtin, M. M. (1978). Mind in Society The Development. University of Texas Press Slavic Series, 1, 91. http://books.google.dk/books?id=JKZztxqdIpgC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+dialogic+imagination:+four+essays&source=bl&ots=GFwdzuoVLp&sig=YCAadsMJ4mZSzxqdKKsxgcIWaYg&hl=da&ei=x3m8S6imBsGmOLjMlJII&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAkQ6AEwAA#v=onepa
Liiman, M., Mulyono, M., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2022). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pendekatan Contextual Teaching Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Disposisi Matematis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.1844
López, J., Robles, I., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2016). Students’ understanding of quadratic equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1119895
Marfuah, M., Suryadi, D., Turmudi, T., & Isnawan, M. G. (2022). Providing Online Learning Situations for In-Service Mathematics Teachers’ External Transposition Knowledge During COVID-19 Pandemic: Case of Indonesia. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(1 Special Issue), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.1.2388
Marfuah, Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2023). Mathematics Teachers’ Interviewing Strategies for Diagnosing Students’ Learning Obstacles. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v12i2.57042
Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2017). Effects of Teacher Preparation Courses: Do Graduates Use What They Learned to Plan Mathematics Lessons? In American Educational Research Journal (Vol. 54, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217695217
Mulyani, N. (2019). Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru pada MTsN Serang melalui Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional dan Pedagogik. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(01), 87. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v5i01.1826
Musyrifah, E., Afgani Dahlan, J., Cahya, E., & Hafiz, M. (2022). Analisis Learning Obstacles mahasiswa Calon Guru matematika pada Konsep Turunan. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 8(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.8.2.187-196
Musyrifah, E., Dwirahayu, G., & Satriawati, G. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Bagi Guru MI dalam Upaya Mendukung Keterampilan Mengajar serta Peningkatan Literasi Numerasi. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 8(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.8.1.61-72
Østergaard, K. (2013). Theory and practice in mathematics teacher education Kaj Østergaard. 21–26.
Pansell, A., & Boistrup, L. B. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ teaching practices in relation to textbooks: Exploring praxeologies. Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(3), 541–562. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1444
Prabowo, A., & Juandi, D. (2020). Analisis situasi didaktis dalam pembelajaran matematika berbantuan ICT pada siswa SMP. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v15i1.32573
Putra, Z. H. (2019). Praxeological change and the density of rational numbers: The case of pre-service teachers in Denmark and Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105867
R. Dangal, M., & Joshi, R. (2020). Hermeneutic Phenomenology: Essence in Educational Research. Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy, 4(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojsp.0401.03025d
Rasmussen, K. (2016). Lesson study in prospective mathematics teacher education: didactic and paradidactic technology in the post-lesson reflection. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9299-6
Rasuli, M. H. (2020). The Significance of a Lesson plan and Its Considerations in Teaching and Learning Process. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) Www.Ijrar.Org, 7(1), 852–857. www.ijrar.org
Reid O’Connor, B., & Norton, S. (2024). Exploring the challenges of learning quadratic equations and reflecting upon curriculum structure and implementation. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 36(1), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00434-w
Rohimah, S. M., Darta, D., & Anggraeni, R. I. (2022). Analisis Learning Obstacles pada Materi Pecahan Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 7(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v7i2.6386
Rusznyak, L., & Walton, E. (2011). Lesson planning guidelines for student teachers: A scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Education as Change, 15(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.619141
Sahin-taskin, C. (2017). Exploring Pre-service Teachers ’ Perceptions of Lesson Planning in Primary Education. 8(12), 57–63.
Selowa, R., & Dhlamini, Z. B. (2023). Exploring Grade 11 Learners’ Algebraic Thinking in the Formulation of Quadratic Equations From Graphs. International Journal of Education, 16(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v16i2.50496
Shinno, Y., & Mizoguchi, T. (2021). Theoretical approaches to teachers ’ lesson designs involving the adaptation of mathematics textbooks : two cases from kyouzai kenkyuu in Japan. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1387–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01269-8
Siregar, S. (2017). Efektifitas penggunaan simulasi geogebra pada pembelajaran grafik fungsi kuadrat. Edumatica, 07(1), 11–20.
Sloan, A., & Bowe, B. (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: The philosophy, the methodologies, and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers’ experiences of curriculum design. Quality and Quantity, 48(3), 1291–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9835-3
Sumarni, S., Darhim, D., & Siti, F. (2019). Profile of mathematical knowledge for teaching of prospective mathematics teachers in develop the lesson plan. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042107
Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR). https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=Ea4oF0EAAAAJ&citation_for_view=Ea4oF0EAAAAJ:ziOE8S1-AIUC
Tesfamicael, S. A., & Lundeby, Ø. A. (2019). A comparative study of Norwegian and Ethiopian textbooks: The case of relations and functions using anthropological theory of didactics (ATD). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070315
Umah, U., & Rahmawati, A. (2024). Challenges in teaching students to plot equations : Another impact of graphing procedures. 10(September), 501–515.
Van de Ven, A. H. (2016). Grounding the research phenomenon. Journal of Change Management, 16(4), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2016.1230336
Wijayanti, D., & Winslow, C. (2017). Mathematical practice in textbooks analysis: Praxeological reference models, the case of proportion. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 6(3), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2017.2078
Xu, L., & Clarke, D. (2019). Speaking or not speaking as a cultural practice: analysis of mathematics classroom discourse in Shanghai, Seoul, and Melbourne. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09901-x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v14i2.431
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indexed by:
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal
SEAMEO Regional Centre for QITEP in Mathematics
Jl. Kaliurang Km 6, Sambisari, Condongcatur, Depok, Sleman
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Telp. +62 274 889955
Email: seamej@qitepinmath.org
p-ISSN: 2089-4716 | e-ISSN: 2721-8546
Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
View My Stats
Supported by:
